The short version

Side by side

TiiiimeTiming
Tracking modelManual timer, started in one keystrokeAutomatic activity tracking, plus timers
PlatformsNative macOS app (macOS 26+)Native macOS app + web app
Records app and website usageNoYes
Linear integrationLinear issues in the QuickStart launcher; read-onlyImports your assigned issues (Expert plan); can write a time table to each issue as an attachment (Connect plan)
Idle detectionYesYes
Auto-categorizationApple Intelligence suggests the activity, on-deviceRules and suggestions based on recorded activity
AI assistant accessCLI + MCP serverHas an API and integrations
SyncYour own iCloudTiming's web service
Pricing$4.99/month or $39.99/year, all featuresTiered plans (Professional, Expert, Connect); 30-day trial*

*See timingapp.com/pricing for current prices. Linear details from Timing's Linear help page, October 2026.

Automatic vs. intentional tracking

Timing's strength is that you don't have to remember to start a timer. It records your activity in the background, and you review the timeline later. That's great for reconstructing a messy day, but it also means a detailed log of every app and site you use, and a review step to turn that log into billable time.

Tiiiime takes the other route. Instead of recording everything, it makes the right timer nearly effortless to start: ⌃⌥⌘Space, type a few letters of the task or Linear issue, press return. Idle detection catches the times you forget to stop, and Apple Intelligence suggests the activity tag on-device. There's no timeline to clean up at the end of the week.

Linear: which one is better?

Both connect to Linear. Timing imports your assigned issues and, on its top plan, writes tracked time back to each issue as an attachment, which is useful if your team wants to see hours inside Linear. Tiiiime puts your Linear issues in its launcher, shows status, priority, cycle and estimate without opening Linear, and tracks hours per issue, using read-only access only. It's included in the one plan.